Meldung 51 (NO-1128): Difference between revisions

From CODOH Forum Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Summary ==
== Summary ==


Meldung 51/NO-1128 is a document purportedly detailing orders from Himmler to Hitler regarding the execution of 300,000 Jews in General Commissariat Volhynia-Podolia in 1942. The authenticity of this document has been questioned, with some suggesting that the word "exekutiert" (executed) might be a misinterpretation of "evakuiert" (evacuated). The reported figure of 363,211 executions in this region during a short period in 1942 is considered unrealistic by early Holocaust researcher Gerald Reitlinger, who acknowledged it as a "manifest exaggeration."
Meldung 51/NO-1128 is a document purportedly detailing orders from Himmler to Hitler regarding the execution of 363,211 Jews in General Commissariat Volhynia-Podolia in 1942. The authenticity of this document has been questioned, with some suggesting that the word "exekutiert" (executed) might be a misinterpretation of "evakuiert" (evacuated). The reported figure of 363,211 executions in this region during a short period in 1942 is considered unrealistic by early Holocaust researcher Gerald Reitlinger, who acknowledged it as a "manifest exaggeration."<ref>[Gerald Reitlinger, "The Final Solution: The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe 1939-45," Jason Aronson, 1987, p. 226, originally published 1953]</ref>


Historical records and demographic data from the region further challenge the claims of Meldung 51. Historian Carlo Mattogno, in his book "The Einsatzgruppen," points out that contemporary demographic assessments by researchers Alexander Kruglov and Shmuel Spector suggest significantly lower numbers of Jewish victims in 1942, totaling around 171,900 for Volhynia and Podolia, well short of the reported 363,211. Einsatzgruppe C's report from April 1942 also indicates that about 40,000 Jews had already been "resettled" by that time, further reducing the feasible number of victims. Additionally, Christian Gerlach's estimate of 86,000 Jews killed in Polesie in 1942 brings the total potential victims to a maximum of around 217,900, still less than 60% of the 363,211 figure.<ref>[Carlo Mattogno, "The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories," Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 39, 2nd revised edition, January 2022, pp. 250-259, ISBN: 978-1-911733-77-5, HolocaustHandbooks.com]</ref>
Historical records and demographic data from the region further challenge the claims of Meldung 51. Historian Carlo Mattogno, in his book "The Einsatzgruppen," points out that contemporary demographic assessments by researchers Alexander Kruglov and Shmuel Spector suggest significantly lower numbers of Jewish victims in 1942, totaling around 171,900 for Volhynia and Podolia, well short of the reported 363,211. Einsatzgruppe C's report from April 1942 also indicates that about 40,000 Jews had already been "resettled" by that time, further reducing the feasible number of victims. Additionally, Christian Gerlach's estimate of 86,000 Jews killed in Polesie in 1942 brings the total potential victims to a maximum of around 217,900, still less than 60% of the 363,211 figure.<ref>[Carlo Mattogno, "The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories," Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 39, 2nd revised edition, January 2022, pp. 250-259, ISBN: 978-1-911733-77-5, HolocaustHandbooks.com]</ref>
Line 11: Line 11:
In conclusion, the Meldung 51 document's claims are not supported by verifiable evidence or realistic population and logistical data. The revisionist perspective, skeptical of the mass extermination narrative, is grounded in the critical analysis of available historical records and demographic statistics, maintaining that the burden of proof for such claims remains unmet.
In conclusion, the Meldung 51 document's claims are not supported by verifiable evidence or realistic population and logistical data. The revisionist perspective, skeptical of the mass extermination narrative, is grounded in the critical analysis of available historical records and demographic statistics, maintaining that the burden of proof for such claims remains unmet.


== Document Images (from NMT Vol. XIII) <ref>[Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Nuernberg, October 1946-April 1949, pp. 269-272]</ref> ==
== Translated Document Images (from NMT Vol. XIII) <ref>[Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Nuernberg, October 1946-April 1949, pp. 269-272]</ref> ==


[[File:269.jpg]] [[File:270.jpg]]  
[[File:269.jpg]] [[File:270.jpg]]  
[[File:271.jpg]] [[File:272.jpg]]
[[File:271.jpg]] [[File:272.jpg]]

Latest revision as of 19:47, 29 December 2024

Summary

Meldung 51/NO-1128 is a document purportedly detailing orders from Himmler to Hitler regarding the execution of 363,211 Jews in General Commissariat Volhynia-Podolia in 1942. The authenticity of this document has been questioned, with some suggesting that the word "exekutiert" (executed) might be a misinterpretation of "evakuiert" (evacuated). The reported figure of 363,211 executions in this region during a short period in 1942 is considered unrealistic by early Holocaust researcher Gerald Reitlinger, who acknowledged it as a "manifest exaggeration."[1]

Historical records and demographic data from the region further challenge the claims of Meldung 51. Historian Carlo Mattogno, in his book "The Einsatzgruppen," points out that contemporary demographic assessments by researchers Alexander Kruglov and Shmuel Spector suggest significantly lower numbers of Jewish victims in 1942, totaling around 171,900 for Volhynia and Podolia, well short of the reported 363,211. Einsatzgruppe C's report from April 1942 also indicates that about 40,000 Jews had already been "resettled" by that time, further reducing the feasible number of victims. Additionally, Christian Gerlach's estimate of 86,000 Jews killed in Polesie in 1942 brings the total potential victims to a maximum of around 217,900, still less than 60% of the 363,211 figure.[2]

The document's portrayal of mass executions lacks corresponding physical evidence, such as mass graves, which raises doubts about its credibility. Moreover, the logistical feasibility of executing over 91,000 people per month while incurring minimal German casualties is questionable. The narrative of mass extermination relies heavily on Soviet Extraordinary Commission reports, which are notorious for exaggerated claims and are considered unreliable. Claims of near-total annihilation in the region are contradicted by other German documents indicating the presence of Jews in Volhynia into 1942.

Alternative interpretations suggest that Germany might have engaged in a policy of evacuation or resettlement, potentially moving Jews to isolated or contested regions. Such actions align with documented German postwar resettlement plans and are consistent with strategic military and administrative objectives.[3]

In conclusion, the Meldung 51 document's claims are not supported by verifiable evidence or realistic population and logistical data. The revisionist perspective, skeptical of the mass extermination narrative, is grounded in the critical analysis of available historical records and demographic statistics, maintaining that the burden of proof for such claims remains unmet.

Translated Document Images (from NMT Vol. XIII) [4]

  1. [Gerald Reitlinger, "The Final Solution: The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe 1939-45," Jason Aronson, 1987, p. 226, originally published 1953]
  2. [Carlo Mattogno, "The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories," Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 39, 2nd revised edition, January 2022, pp. 250-259, ISBN: 978-1-911733-77-5, HolocaustHandbooks.com]
  3. [Discussion on Meldung 51/NO-1128, CODOH Revisionist Forum, https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=149, accessed December 29, 2024]
  4. [Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Nuernberg, October 1946-April 1949, pp. 269-272]