Prisoners of War (POWs) - Revision history

Callafangers at 01:16, 25 May 2025

2025-05-25T01:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 24 May 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:
	== Conclusion ==		== Conclusion ==

	: The Soviet government's treatment of its own POWs offers a framework for understanding its potential attitudes toward Jews in camps in the Eastern-occupied territories as the war ended.		: The Soviet government's treatment of its own POWs offers a framework for understanding its potential attitudes toward Jews in camps in the Eastern-occupied territories as the war ended. The same policies of disdain, punitive measures, and refusal of aid evident in Stalin's treatment of Soviet POWs could have logically extended to Jews under similar circumstances.
	:* The same policies of disdain, punitive measures, and refusal of aid evident in Stalin's treatment of Soviet POWs could have logically extended to Jews under similar circumstances.

	==References==		==References==

	<references />		<references />

Callafangers at 22:52, 2 February 2025

2025-02-02T22:52:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 2 February 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:* This refusal to engage was consistent with other instances where Soviet officials did not reply to communications from the ICRC regarding aid for Soviet POWs.		:* This refusal to engage was consistent with other instances where Soviet officials did not reply to communications from the ICRC regarding aid for Soviet POWs.

	==== Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Critique ====		=== Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Critique ===
	: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn criticized the Soviet government's betrayal of its POWs, emphasizing their abandonment to die in captivity and the false promises of forgiveness upon their return.<ref>Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr I., "The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation (Vol. 1)," New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1974, p. 240, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>		: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn criticized the Soviet government's betrayal of its POWs, emphasizing their abandonment to die in captivity and the false promises of forgiveness upon their return.<ref>Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr I., "The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation (Vol. 1)," New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1974, p. 240, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>

	# Solzhenitsyn referred to the Soviet government’s actions as a "foul and terrible deed."		: Solzhenitsyn referred to the Soviet government’s actions as a "foul and terrible deed."
	## He noted three phases of betrayal: on the battlefield, in captivity, and upon returning home.		:* He noted three phases of betrayal: on the battlefield, in captivity, and upon returning home.
	:* He argued that this betrayal was one of the most significant crimes in Russia’s history.		:* He argued that this betrayal was one of the most significant crimes in Russia’s history.

Line 39:		Line 39:

	: The Soviet government's treatment of its own POWs offers a framework for understanding its potential attitudes toward Jews in camps in the Eastern-occupied territories as the war ended.		: The Soviet government's treatment of its own POWs offers a framework for understanding its potential attitudes toward Jews in camps in the Eastern-occupied territories as the war ended.
	:* The same policies of disdain, punitive measures, and refusal of aid evident in Stalin's treatment of Soviet POWs could logically ~~have~~ extended to Jews under similar circumstances.		:* The same policies of disdain, punitive measures, and refusal of aid evident in Stalin's treatment of Soviet POWs could have logically extended to Jews under similar circumstances.

	==References==		==References==

	<references />		<references />

Callafangers at 22:47, 2 February 2025

2025-02-02T22:47:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 2 February 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:
	=== Expected Soviet Treatment of Jews in Camps ===		=== Expected Soviet Treatment of Jews in Camps ===
	: Given the Soviet government's harsh stance on its own captured soldiers, a similar or even more punitive treatment could be expected for Jews captured by the advancing Soviet army in camps or collection sites in Eastern-occupied territories.<ref name="multiple">John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025. Inconvenient History, Vol. 17, No. 1.</ref>		: Given the Soviet government's harsh stance on its own captured soldiers, a similar or even more punitive treatment could be expected for Jews captured by the advancing Soviet army in camps or collection sites in Eastern-occupied territories.<ref name="multiple">John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025. Inconvenient History, Vol. 17, No. 1.</ref>
	:* Jews ~~might have been~~ viewed as traitors or collaborators for having been in German-controlled camps, receiving the same disdain as Soviet POWs~~, or worse~~.		:* Jews were likely viewed as traitors or collaborators for having been in German-controlled camps, receiving the same disdain or worse as Soviet POWs.
	:* The Soviet refusal to accept aid suggests a broader policy of neglect that could extend to Jews perceived as compromised by German association.		:* The Soviet refusal to accept aid suggests a broader policy of neglect that could extend to Jews perceived as compromised by German association.

Callafangers: Created page with "The treatment of Soviet POWs during World War II, especially by the Soviet government, highlights a significant aspect of the war's broader narrative. This article delves into the Soviet government's policies toward its own soldiers who were captured by German forces, and extends this framework to understand possible Soviet attitudes towards Jews interned in camps in Eastern-occupied territories as the war drew to a close. == Soviet Treatment of POWs == === Order No. 2..."

2025-02-02T22:45:57Z

Created page with "The treatment of Soviet POWs during World War II, especially by the Soviet government, highlights a significant aspect of the war's broader narrative. This article delves into the Soviet government's policies toward its own soldiers who were captured by German forces, and extends this framework to understand possible Soviet attitudes towards Jews interned in camps in Eastern-occupied territories as the war drew to a close. == Soviet Treatment of POWs == === Order No. 2..."

New page

The treatment of Soviet POWs during World War II, especially by the Soviet government, highlights a significant aspect of the war's broader narrative. This article delves into the Soviet government's policies toward its own soldiers who were captured by German forces, and extends this framework to understand possible Soviet attitudes towards Jews interned in camps in Eastern-occupied territories as the war drew to a close.

== Soviet Treatment of POWs ==

=== Order No. 270 and Soviet Policy Toward Captured Soldiers ===
: Stalin's Order No. 270, issued on August 16, 1941, declared Soviet soldiers who surrendered to be traitors, subject to destruction by any means and the deprivation of state allowance and relief for their families. This harsh policy underscores the Soviet government's disdain for its captured soldiers.<ref>Stalin, Order No. 270, August 16, 1941, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>
::* Soviet soldiers who surrendered were shot on the spot during long marches to POW camps, used open freight cars with no protection from the weather for transportation, and often provided no shelter from the elements in the camps.
:::* The camps' conditions often resulted in high death rates, with Russian POWs describing them as "pure hell."<ref>Snyder, Timothy, "Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin," New York: Basic Books, 2010, pp. 176-177, 179, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>

=== Soviet Refusal of Aid to POWs ===
: The Soviet government refused to cooperate with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) regarding the regulation of POW conditions.<ref>Tolstoy, Nikolai, "Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of The Allies 1944-1947," New York and London: Pegasus Books, 1977, pp. 33-34, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>
:: The Soviet leadership's refusal to send food parcels or accept humanitarian aid from other nations such as Great Britain and Canada is indicative of a deliberate policy of neglecting captured soldiers.<ref>Teplyakov, Yuri, "Stalin's War Against His Own Troops: The Tragic Fate of Soviet Prisoners of War in German Captivity," The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, July/Aug. 1994, p. 6, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>
<blockquote>
The Soviet Union was not a party to The Hague Conventions. Nor was the Soviet Union a signatory of the Geneva Convention of 1929, which defined more precisely the conditions to be accorded to POWs. Germany nevertheless approached the Red Cross (ICRC) immediately after war broke out with the Soviet Union to attempt to regulate the conditions of prisoners on both sides. The ICRC contacted Soviet ambassadors in London and Sweden, but the Soviet leaders in Moscow refused to cooperate. [...]

Over the winter Germany made further efforts to establish relations with the Soviets in an attempt to introduce the provisions of The Hague and Geneva Conventions concerning POWs. Germany was rebuffed again.
</blockquote>

=== Stalin's Direct Response to German Efforts ===
: When Hitler appealed to Stalin for the establishment of postal services for POWs and urged Red Cross inspections of the camps, Stalin's dismissive response underlined the Soviet government's indifference to the plight of its soldiers.<ref>Tolstoy, Nikolai, "Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of The Allies 1944-1947," New York and London: Pegasus Books, 1977, p. 34, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>
:* Stalin declared that there were no Russian prisoners of war and expressed no interest in a postal service for Germans.
:* This refusal to engage was consistent with other instances where Soviet officials did not reply to communications from the ICRC regarding aid for Soviet POWs.

==== Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Critique ====
: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn criticized the Soviet government's betrayal of its POWs, emphasizing their abandonment to die in captivity and the false promises of forgiveness upon their return.<ref>Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr I., "The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956: An Experiment in Literary Investigation (Vol. 1)," New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1974, p. 240, cited in John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025</ref>

# Solzhenitsyn referred to the Soviet government’s actions as a "foul and terrible deed."
## He noted three phases of betrayal: on the battlefield, in captivity, and upon returning home.
:* He argued that this betrayal was one of the most significant crimes in Russia’s history.

== Implications for Jews in Eastern-Occupied Territories ==

=== Expected Soviet Treatment of Jews in Camps ===
: Given the Soviet government's harsh stance on its own captured soldiers, a similar or even more punitive treatment could be expected for Jews captured by the advancing Soviet army in camps or collection sites in Eastern-occupied territories.<ref name="multiple">John Wear, "Jewish Soldiers in Nazi Captivity," January 26, 2025. Inconvenient History, Vol. 17, No. 1.</ref>
:* Jews might have been viewed as traitors or collaborators for having been in German-controlled camps, receiving the same disdain as Soviet POWs, or worse.
:* The Soviet refusal to accept aid suggests a broader policy of neglect that could extend to Jews perceived as compromised by German association.

== Conclusion ==

: The Soviet government's treatment of its own POWs offers a framework for understanding its potential attitudes toward Jews in camps in the Eastern-occupied territories as the war ended.
:* The same policies of disdain, punitive measures, and refusal of aid evident in Stalin's treatment of Soviet POWs could logically have extended to Jews under similar circumstances.

==References==

<references />